{"created":"2023-05-15T12:05:44.874237+00:00","id":10448,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"835e8e79-7751-4e0c-9ce1-5eeed4185996"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"10448","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"10448"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:iwate-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00010448","sets":["1523:1524"]},"author_link":["64550","64551"],"item_28_alternative_title_23":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Analysis on Individual Difference in Urban Landscape Evaluation Based on the Concept of Expected Schema"}]},"item_28_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2001-03-01","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographic_titles":[{}]}]},"item_28_date_6":{"attribute_name":"登録日","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_date_issued_datetime":"2011-12-21"}]},"item_28_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"科学研究費補助金[基盤研究(C)(2)](課題番号11680100)研究成果報告書","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_28_description_12":{"attribute_name":"Abstract","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本研究は、居住経験が空間評価において個人差を形成するプロセスの解明を目的とするものである。個人差研究の技法としてPAC(Personal Attitucle Construct:個人別態度構造)分析に注目し、さらに認知心理学的な立場からU.NEISSERによる「予期図式」を説明概念として位置づけることで得られた研究知見の説明を試みた。呈示刺激は、言葉および盛岡市の景観写真5種類、被験者は盛岡市の居住年数2年・10年を軸として選定された岩手大学学生9名である。\n\n以下、得られた研究知見は以下のように要約される。\n\n(1)街路空間評価においては、居住経験が2年以下の場合、景観構成要素が個別的に「図」となりやすい。マイナス要因は共通に「図」を形成しやすく、プラス要因が被験者の趣向性を反映して個人差となって表れていた。一方、居住経験10年以上では、呈示刺激より自分自身の中で形成された空間イメージが優先し、街路のモノがほとんど「図」を形成せず、イメージ表現では形容詞が多用されていた。これら個人差の中に、一定のイメージ変容プロセスを捉えることができた。\n\n(2)自然を背景とする景観の評価では、自然に対する「価値付け」が評価を大きく左右し、価値付けの範囲が何を取り込んでいくかに個人差が見られた。居住経験10年以上では、刺激全体が価値付けの対象となり、自然や文化的価値を含む景観の場合にも前述イメージの変容プロセスを確認できた。\n\n(3)空間評価における個人差としての「図」の形成を成り立たしめる「地」の形成に「予期図式」を説明概念として適用し、空間評価のプロセスをモデル図として示すことができ、いわゆる「Filter-out現象」をFilterを通過してしまう意味で捉えるのではなく、逆にFilterの目地が詰まっていく過程として説明することができた。","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"The Purpose of this study is to clarify the formative process of individual difference in urban landscape evaluation. PAC (Personal Attitude Construct) Analysis was tried to 9 students of Iwate-University by using 5 stimuli including landscape pictures of Morioka City. Then, the concept of expected schema by U.Neisser was applied to the findings through the analysis.\n\nThe results were summarized as follows ;\n\n1. In the evaluation of street space, the students living in Morioka less than 2 years were conscious of the objects in the space as 'Figure'. As for ones living more than 10 years, they were unconscious of them, and evaluated according to their images formed previously and expressed the atmosphere by adjective words. The formative process was found in those differences.\n\n2. In the evaluation of landscape with nature such as mountains, rivers, and so on, it was important factor how the students recognized the value of nature. For ones living more than 10 years, all of the scene in the picture were valuable and it was confirmed that the above-mentioned formative process was applied to this case.\n\n3. It was necessary to form 'Background' to make 'Figure' clear. Then, the concept of expected schema by U.Neisser was applied to the attempt to make model on formative process in individual difference in space evaluation. The process could be explained as the phenomenon of 'Filter-out' with not rough but dense 'Background' by the model showed in this report,","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_28_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"64551","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"NAGASAWA, Yukiko"}]}]},"item_28_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者(機関)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"岩手大学教育学部"}]},"item_28_version_type_27":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa","subitem_version_type":"AM"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"長澤, 由喜子"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"64550","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2016-11-14"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"kaken11680100.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"6.4 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"kaken11680100.pdf","url":"https://iwate-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/10448/files/kaken11680100.pdf"},"version_id":"b158f410-2999-4fd1-b071-12fa2efdb7e2"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"Dwelling Experience","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Expected Schema","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Individual Difference","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Landscape Evaluation","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"PAC Analysis","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"PAC分析","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ラダーリング","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"予期図式","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"個人差","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"居住経験","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"景観評価","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"盛岡","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"research report","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws"}]},"item_title":"予期図式概念に基づく都市景観評価の個人差分析","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"予期図式概念に基づく都市景観評価の個人差分析"}]},"item_type_id":"28","owner":"3","path":["1524"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2011-12-21"},"publish_date":"2011-12-21","publish_status":"0","recid":"10448","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["予期図式概念に基づく都市景観評価の個人差分析"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-16T11:34:26.505612+00:00"}