@article{oai:iwate-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00010530,
 author = {SHUHAMA, Yujo},
 journal = {岩手大学英語教育論集},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {We have seen that the auxiliary do can occur in various kinds of sentences and to explain this phenomenon has been a controversial issue as well as a classical one in generative linguistics. Among recent explanations, Bobaljik (1994) and Sütze (2004) are influential, but antitheti.cat the former analyzes do as a last resort device while the latter analyzes it as a modal. Both have some theoretical problems to solve in terms of English verbal morphology and two of them, argument- adjunct asymmetry and syntactic status of the negative not, are discussed. On these points, we have seen that adjacency-based approach needs to reconsider its treatment of adverbs and the negative not should be situated in head of NegP. To solve the remained problems, further inquiry is needed in the future research.},
 pages = {71--80},
 title = {The English Auxiliary Doin Verbal Morphology},
 volume = {7},
 year = {2005}
}