@article{oai:iwate-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009226,
 author = {大石, 康彦 and 金濱, 聖子 and 比屋根, 哲 and 田口, 春孝},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {日本林学会誌},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {森林環境のイメージと気分を比較検討することを目的に, 5種類の森林と対照区(森林外)で実験を行った。各実験区においては被験者(n=44)に10分間の自由行動を与えた後にPOMSおよびSD法により評価させ,最後に5種類の森林を順位付けさせた。POMSの結果,活気を除く5尺度(緊張,抑うつ,怒り,疲労,混乱)に森林外と各実験区の間に有意差が認められたが,5実験区相互の間では一部を除き有意差が認められなかった。SD法の結果,価値因子,空間因子が認められた。価値因子においては,2区が最高,1区が最低の評価を得た。空間因子においては,1区が最も開放的な評価を得,4区が最も閉鎖的な評価を得た。好みの順位は2区一5区一4区一3区剤1区であった。POMS尺度,SD法因子,好みの順位の結果からSpiamanの順位相関係数を求めた。POMSの活気尺度と好みの順位の間にプラスの相関が,疲労尺度と好みの順位の間にマイナスの相関が認められた。

The purpose of this study was to compare "the image of a forest environment" with "the mood of the forest". We examined five test sites and a contrast site (outside the forest), giving 10 minutes of free time to the subjects at each test site. Forty-four subjects were evaluated using the profile of mood states (POMS) and the semantic differential (SD) method. At last, subjects carried out a ranking of the five test sites by liking. As a result of POMS, significant differences between the test sites and the contrast site were accepted for five parameters, with the exception of vigor. Among the 5 test sites, no significant difference was accepted, except for partial differences. As a result of the SD method, the value factor and the space factor were accepted. For the value factor, site 2 was given the highest evaluation and site 1 the lowest evaluation. The most common ranking was site 1 < site 3 <site 4 <site 5 <site 2. We then analyzed the relationship between the POMS measures, the SD method factors, and the most common ranking. A plus correlation was accepted between the POMS vigor measure and the most common ranking. A minus correlation was accepted between the POMS fatigue measure and the most common ranking.},
 pages = {70--77},
 title = {森林空間が人に与えるイメージと気分の比較 －POMSおよびSD法を用いた森林環境評価－},
 volume = {85},
 year = {2003}
}