{"created":"2023-05-15T12:04:39.989431+00:00","id":9226,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"65424cb3-a43e-4efc-afee-74e96ed0be1a"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"9226","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"9226"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:iwate-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009226","sets":["1504:1510"]},"author_link":["72346","72347","72348","72343","72345","72349","72350","72344"],"item_16_alternative_title_23":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Psychological Examination in a Forest Environment Using Profile of Mood States and Semantic Differential Method."}]},"item_16_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2003-02-16","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"77","bibliographicPageStart":"70","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"85","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"日本林学会誌"}]}]},"item_16_date_6":{"attribute_name":"登録日","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_date_issued_datetime":"2010-11-01"}]},"item_16_description_12":{"attribute_name":"Abstract","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"森林環境のイメージと気分を比較検討することを目的に, 5種類の森林と対照区(森林外)で実験を行った。各実験区においては被験者(n=44)に10分間の自由行動を与えた後にPOMSおよびSD法により評価させ,最後に5種類の森林を順位付けさせた。POMSの結果,活気を除く5尺度(緊張,抑うつ,怒り,疲労,混乱)に森林外と各実験区の間に有意差が認められたが,5実験区相互の間では一部を除き有意差が認められなかった。SD法の結果,価値因子,空間因子が認められた。価値因子においては,2区が最高,1区が最低の評価を得た。空間因子においては,1区が最も開放的な評価を得,4区が最も閉鎖的な評価を得た。好みの順位は2区一5区一4区一3区剤1区であった。POMS尺度,SD法因子,好みの順位の結果からSpiamanの順位相関係数を求めた。POMSの活気尺度と好みの順位の間にプラスの相関が,疲労尺度と好みの順位の間にマイナスの相関が認められた。\n\nThe purpose of this study was to compare \"the image of a forest environment\" with \"the mood of the forest\". We examined five test sites and a contrast site (outside the forest), giving 10 minutes of free time to the subjects at each test site. Forty-four subjects were evaluated using the profile of mood states (POMS) and the semantic differential (SD) method. At last, subjects carried out a ranking of the five test sites by liking. As a result of POMS, significant differences between the test sites and the contrast site were accepted for five parameters, with the exception of vigor. Among the 5 test sites, no significant difference was accepted, except for partial differences. As a result of the SD method, the value factor and the space factor were accepted. For the value factor, site 2 was given the highest evaluation and site 1 the lowest evaluation. The most common ranking was site 1 < site 3